Christchurch East MP Reuben Davidson and Ilam MP Hamish Campbell have weighed in on several major local issues in a wide-ranging political discussion, including ballooning costs at Canterbury Museum, central city business rates, and the ongoing debate over Christchurch’s transport funding.

Canterbury Museum under fire for $50 million top-up

Both MPs acknowledged the cultural significance of the Canterbury Museum, which is undergoing a major redevelopment — but stopped short of endorsing a full bailout after the museum director appealed for an extra $50 million in funding.

Davidson said while the museum is a valuable institution, the public shouldn’t automatically foot the bill.

“I certainly wouldn’t think that council or central government should just simply hand over $25 million each. But I do think there’s a conversation that needs to happen there about why it’s needed and what it’s needed for,” he said.

Campbell agreed, saying any request would need to go through a rigorous process. “I don’t think there’s been a formal request yet, but any funding would need to ensure value for money and alignment with clear goals.”

Davidson defended the museum’s cost pressures, saying compliance, heritage protection, and building standards had driven up expenses. “You’re dealing with a priceless collection. It’s not just about us enjoying the museum today — it’s about ensuring it’s there for future generations.”

Business rates debate reignites

The MPs also reacted to Christchurch property developer Antony Gough’s scathing criticism of the Council’s proposed 8.2% rates hike. Gough, who appeared at a public deputation this week, said businesses were being “squeezed” and warned the Council was “killing” the central city.

Campbell said Gough had a point. “We want a vibrant city centre. With people moving here from Auckland and Wellington, we need to make sure we can retain businesses. We’ve got the Court Theatre, the stadium, Metro Sports — but without strong businesses, the city won’t thrive.”

Davidson agreed the balance needed to be right. “The Council needs to make sure contributions are fair and sustainable, but it also has to support the businesses that are central to the city’s success.”

He jokingly extended an invitation to Gough: “If anyone’s not happy with central city rate rises — come out to New Brighton. We’d love to have some vibrant hospitality.”

Congestion charges and regional transport boards raise concerns

The Government’s proposal to introduce regional transport boards and congestion charging also drew sharp responses. Campbell said while Christchurch traffic was not yet a major issue, the bill — which is open for public submissions — was about preparing for the future.

“We need all the tools in the toolbox,” he said. “But this isn’t a done deal. It’s just a proposal, and the public can have their say.”

Davidson, however, said it felt like a “new tax” and warned that Christchurch residents would be paying for delays they didn’t create.

“At a time when people are under real cost of living pressure, this suggests Wellington will reach into your back pocket every time you’re stuck in traffic — that doesn’t sit right with me. Local transport decisions should stay local.”

Funding fairness questioned

When asked whether Christchurch was getting its fair share of Government transport funding, Davidson was blunt.

“No, it’s absolutely not. It’s not getting even its own contribution. We’re being given money once, then that money disappears, then it’s re-announced — and we’re expected to be grateful. That’s not new funding — it’s regifting.”

Campbell pushed back, referencing Christchurch Mayor Phil Mauger’s recent comments to Chris Lynch Media that the city had received $90 million more than it asked for.

“I appreciate the previous government promised $78 million just before the election — some might call that pork barrel politics,” Campbell said. “The Council struggled to access that money, so it was reprioritised. But look what we’re getting — Brougham Street, Ashburton Bridge, the Pegasus-Woodend bypass, and the Pages Road Bridge. These are real projects happening on the ground.”

Davidson was not convinced. “Pages Road is an $80 million project — the Government is tipping in $6.5 million. That’s not even 10%,” he said. “This is smoke and mirrors — funding we were promised has vanished, and now we’re being told to clap for crumbs.”